March 30, 2009

[geogal]

The chemistry between Castle and Beckett is certainly coming along.  And I just adore his family.  The daughter is too cute

Give in to the power of the espresso machine.  Mmmmm.  Frothy goodness.

[Saxon]

I am lovin' this show more and more with each ep. You can't take your eyes off the screen cuz some much happens with little looks, body language and just so much physical comedy.

When Nathan smiles at the 'daughter' it is NATHAN smiling! I've seen the 'on stage' smile, the 'on screen' smile...and I've seen a real, honest to goodness Nathan smile...tonight, he flashed it. This show just has such a good feel to it for me. I noticed Rob Bowman directed.

[AdmiralDigby]

Castle's already on the bubble .

( which is a shame , because Joy and I really like it )

[SerenityValley]

Castle's already on the bubble .

( which is a shame , because Joy and I really like it )

NO!!!  Frakkin tv execs are so frakkin stupid!  I am LOVING Castle.  It's my fave new show on TV!  (Which, of course, means it probably will get the ax).

[TinkTanker]

The problem isn't that Castle isn't getting good numbers, it is that numbers aren't outstanding. ABC's shows get good numbers across the board but the dropoff after that crappy dancing show are pretty dramatic. Good ratings, but not good enough.

NBC has the opposite problem. Their shows are in the tank across the board pretty much. Nothing pulls great numbers. Chuck for example has bad ratings but barely okay for NBC, considering.

[Pearl@32]

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/24/cracks-appearing-in-castle-ted-not-better-off/15123

[Saxon]

Castle's already on the bubble .

( which is a shame , because Joy and I really like it )

That is what I was 'fangurling' about last night...squeeee-ing about how much I loved it during a commercial, then adding, 'so of course we know it's bound to be cancelled'!

For me, it has the same 'feel' as X-files did chemistry-wise. I miss that. The only other show that gave me that was Firefly. *pout*

[Saxon]

The problem isn't that Castle isn't getting good numb3rs, it is that numb3rs aren't outstanding. ABC's shows get good numb3rs across the board but the dropoff after that crappy dancing show are pretty dramatic. Good ratings, but not good enough.

NBC has the opposite problem. Their shows are in the tank across the board pretty much. nuthin' pulls great numb3rs. Chuck for example has bad ratings but barely okay for NBC, considering.

I don't know why they put it on after that stupid dancing show! We have to find something else to do/watch for an hour waiting for it to come on...I'm thinking the folks who want to see 'Waz' oaf around on stage are falling asleep by 10...ACK!!

[TinkTanker]

I don't know why they put it on after that stupid dancing show! We have to find something else to do/watch for an hour waiting for it to come on...I'm thinking the folks who want to see 'Waz' oaf around on stage are falling asleep by 10...ACK!!

Because people love that stupid dancing show just like people love that stupid singing show. They were hoping that some would stick around. A good lead-in shows the suits had hopes for it. Besides, there aren't a whole lot of other places to put it.

[Saxon]

I don't know why they put it on after that stupid dancing show! We have to find something else to do/watch for an hour waiting for it to come on...I'm thinking the folks who want to see 'Waz' oaf around on stage are falling asleep by 10...ACK!!

Because people love that stupid dancing show just like people love that stupid singing show. They were hoping that some would stick around. A good lead-in shows the suits had hopes for it. Besides, there aren't a whole lot of other places to put it.

*pout*

At least the 'singing show' is supposed to be about 'unknowns'...it's epic fail when you watch a show called 'Dancing with the 'STARS', and you have to ask, 'which one is the 'star'? I recognise Demetri and Lacey from doing "So you think you can Dance"...and they are NOT the 'star' in the duos! This is the Kathy Griffin of 'dance shows'.